(Score:5, Insightful) by Armchair milf hunter b/w
letter to the editor, milf hunter devon , b/w, photos, california pimp , milf hunter rene , 14 year old sex pics , older woman sex , weblog, amateurallure , says galloway, oxytocin, kacey , prssure massage for sexual orgasms and & herbs for sexual orgasms., how to perform oral sex on a woman , kanji, law, [ Parent ] Re:Watching the watchers? by R.Caley (Score:2) Monday April 18, milf hunter @02:13AM Re:Watching the watchers? by Armchair Dissident (Score:3) Monday April 18, @02:26AM Re:Watching the watchers? by R.Caley (Score:1) Monday April 18, @02:39AM Re:Watching the watchers? by KarmaMB84 (Score:2) Monday April 18, @06:33AM Re:Watching the watchers? (Score:4, Insightful) by Armchair Dissident (557503) * on Monday April 18, @07:46AM (#12268180) "Safe" milf hunter and "Supervised" are not the same thing and your analogy is stretching a bit :) If I leave a child at a day-care centre, I have every reason to believe that my milf hunter child will not come to physical harm because day-care centres are not normally staffed by child-molestors or chainsaw juggling instructors. A better analogy, perhaps, is a playground. If a parent takes a child to a playground, and then leave them unsupervised at the playground, then the parent is being negligent and has no good reason to sue the local council.
Best Mature Paysites
(Score:5, Insightful) by Armchair Dissident (557503) * on Monday April 18, @02:04AM (#12267145) Normally I would completely agree with you, however in this instance, AOL were advertising the service as being safe for b/w kids. Much like a day-care centre where you drop your kids off with adults you believe are there to ensure your children won't come to any harm; AOL b/w advertised this service as being a place where your kids could safely chat on the internet. If a day care centre did not perform adequate checks on their employees, b/w and then employed a known pedophile who then attempted to molest children at the centre, the centre would rightly be sued for negligence - precisely because they've advertised the service as safe for children. AOL's case is no different; they've advertised the service as safe for kids. Of course, whether AOL have or have not failed in this duty is for the courts to decide.
over 1800 jokes and 500+ funny pics, men, abc news online, told galotta
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the largest sex personals network.FREE signup!
Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams,
meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now